torsdag 30 januari 2014

Comments regarding Galvanic Coupling

One of the most popular experimental evidences in support of galvanic coupling has been described in Wegmuller's doctoral thesis [1]. It has been argued that in case of galvanic coupling alternating current flows inside the human body and not on the surface of the human body. 

It is relatively harder to prove that the alternating current, or alternating potential, necessarily flows inside or outside the human body. Perhaps, the following reason could be given that the outer most upper epidermic layer of skin acts as a dielectric medium for any type of non-invasive body electrode. So  a coupling capacitor is naturally formed on the surface of the skin when an electrode is placed on the human skin. The alternating current driver enables the electric current to cross the capacitive barrier formed on the skin. However, one needs to be careful when using dc current driver which would only saturate the coupling capacitor. Now, the capacitor acts as a current integrator according to the following relationship converting alternating current into alternative potential which could polarize the surface of skin as well.


It has also been argued that the differential electrode used in galvanic coupling provides ground independent reference. But the usage of differential electrode greatly attenuates the signal coupling on the receiver side as the prime current flows between the differential electrodes on the transmitter side. It could additionally be argued that the prolonged exposure of skin to differential electrodes could result in the wastage of useful power as heat which may cause skin itching over a longer duration. So it might be useful to think of some other alternative to reduce ground dependence.

References

    [1] Marc S. Wegmueller, “Intra-Body Communication for Biomedical Sensor Networks,” Doctoral Dissertation, Diss. ETH No. 17323, University of ETH Zurich, 2007


onsdag 29 januari 2014

Practice your Swedish

Upon request I am adding a couple of popular descriptions of the project that was direct towards visiting high school students (gymnasieelever) that we want to attract to Linköping University.

The two files are availabe in PDF and are downloaded from Google drive. Please let me know if you need translation ;) For some of the pictures presented in the documents I might have used some ... errgh ... artistic freedom and ... errgh ... borrowed material from the internet.

Enjoy!

tisdag 28 januari 2014

EM wave propagation on the surface of human body


The signal transmission mechanism for human body channel has been described by the propagation of electric field on the surface of human body from an electrical dipole source [1]. 

The electric field received from an infinitesimal dipole in free space is given by the following equation, [1]


Where, I is the current in amps, dl is the length of dipole in meters, k is the wave number, ω is the angular frequency in radians per second and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The term 1/r refers to far-field, 1/r2 refers to induction field and 1/r3 refers to near-field of the dipole.

If we assume that the electromagnetic wave propagation theory as depicted by the above equation correctly explains the phenmenon of signal transmission on the surface of human body then how the following contradictions could be explained?

  1. The relative permittivity for human body is aproximately 50 times more than in free space. If εr term comes in the denominator then the above electric field equation suggests 50 times weaker electric field propagation inside human body than free space. This is contradictory to the fact where conductive property of human body is described as a more suitable medium than free space for electric field propagation over a larger distance.

  2. The above equation also suggests that the length of the electrical dipole decreases with increasing frequency. For a frequency of few MHz, the theoretical length or dimension of the dipole suggested by this equation is much greater than the practical electrical dipole which is actually used in the human body channel experiments in different research papers, which is again a contradiction.

References

    [1] J.Bae, H. Cho, K. Song, H. Lee, and H.-J.Yoo, “The Signal Transmission Mechanism on the Surface of Human Body for Body Channel Communication,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 582-593, March 2012

måndag 27 januari 2014

An embryo towards an integrated circuit for body coupled communication

We are currently assembling the integrated circuit that will form the base analog front end (AFE) for our experiments on body-coupled communication (BCC). What we have found in our investigation of commercial vendors and our own hardware is that the sensitivity "out there" is too low. We need to further increase the accuracy of the main input amplifiers, both in terms of noise, but also tuneable bandwidth. We have concluded that we cannot do all the required changes on board level, and instead we have to go towards the integrated circuit.

The circuit will also offer a standardized serial control interface such that we can interact with the most common microcontrollers/protocols. We will be backwards compatible with our own prototypes and also compatible with some of the commercial vendors.

måndag 20 januari 2014

Smart textiles

This link is mainly in Swedish. However, a Ph.D. has been presented at Linköping University on how to measure e.g. heartbeat and that can be sewn into the clothes.

onsdag 8 januari 2014

Our project is visible at the 2014 CES in Las Vegas, USA

In the chilly January (well, actually not so chilly in Sweden this year, but northern USA seems to take that part this year) our project is now visible at the 2014 CES in Las Vegas. Visit us in the Ericsson booth!
Many thanks to a whole bunch of people - and with the risk of missing someone in this list: Isak, Melki, Simon, Simon, Peter, Irfan, Ek, and many more.